What Are The Advantages of Using a Credit Based Pricing Model for BI Software: Is it the Right Fit for Your SaaS Pricing?
Ryan Echternacht
·
07/21/2025
Credit-based pricing models have become increasingly common in SaaS, especially among products with complex usage or variable consumption patterns. Instead of charging customers directly for each request, feature, or seat, these models let users prepay for a pool of credits, then draw down against that balance as they use the product. Flexible credit pack sizes allow both light and heavy users to select options that fit their needs.
The approach isn’t new. Credit-based models have long been a staple in B2C products, from mobile games to freemium productivity tools. But recently, they’ve started gaining traction in B2B SaaS as well, offering teams a way to simplify packaging, unify multiple usage types, and give customers predictable spend. The rise of hybrid pricing models in SaaS, combining usage-based and subscription elements, has made it easier to integrate credit-based systems for more flexible and scalable billing.
This article looks at what credit-based systems actually are, where they make sense (and where they don’t), and what you’ll need to consider if you’re thinking about adopting one. Modern platforms now enable companies to launch credit models quickly, allowing for rapid experimentation and adaptation.
In a credit-based model, customers prepay for a set number of credits and consume them as they use the product. Each action — whether it’s an API call, export, or feature access — burns a specific number of credits, reducing the overall balance until the user needs to top up, renew, or upgrade.
This is different from postpaid usage-based billing, where customers are charged at the end of a billing period based on what they consumed. It’s also more flexible than flat-rate pricing, which typically assumes uniform usage across customers. The credit value is determined by mapping each credit to specific actions or services, allowing businesses to assign different values to credits depending on the product or feature, which helps manage costs and pricing strategies efficiently.
That abstraction is the core strength of the model. For example, in SaaS, a credit represents a unit of usage such as an API call, storage, or compute time. It gives companies room to evolve pricing, bundle multiple usage types into one system, and shield customers from backend complexity, all while offering a clear budget constraint. Credits act as a universal currency, simplifying billing and management across multiple services or regions, and supporting international expansion under a unified credits act.
To further enhance flexibility, companies can offer credit packs, fixed bundles of credits sold at different price points, which customers can purchase upfront and use as needed. This approach streamlines billing, supports prepaid services, and is widely used in industries like SaaS, cloud services, and digital content.
Usage credits allow companies to flexibly manage and track customer consumption across different product features, making it easier to implement credit-based billing and customer-specific pricing models.
Category | Credit Usage Example | What It Abstracts |
Design tools | 1 credit = 1 high-res export | File size, format, or backend processing time |
Email marketing | 1 credit = 100 emails sent | Variable provider costs, batch size |
Data enrichment | 2 credits = 1 company profile lookup | Source-specific cost, data volume |
Scheduling platforms | 5 credits = 1 branded booking page | Premium features or integrations |
PDF generation APIs | 1 credit = 1 PDF rendered | File complexity or page count |
Video platforms | 10 credits = 1 minute of HD transcoding | Resolution, format, compute time |
Analytics tools | 1 credit = 10,000 events processed | Event volume and retention costs |
Dev tools / CI/CD | 1 credit = 1 test run or build minute | Compute time, concurrency |
AI/ML platforms | 1 credit = 1,000 tokens generated or 1 model inference call | Model size, latency, infra costs |
Some platforms also offer a shared credit pool, allowing users to utilize their usage credits across multiple features or services for greater operational flexibility.
Credit-based models offer SaaS companies a flexible way to charge for usage, without giving up predictability or control. They also enable businesses to manage complex billing and credit management efficiently.
They’re especially useful when:
Customers want budget predictability, but usage isn’t consistent.
With credit-based models, customers prepay for a block of usage and consume it at their own pace. This smooths out variable usage patterns while giving finance teams a predictable spend. This approach leads to more predictable revenue streams.
Products have more than one usage dimension.
Credits can unify pricing across different actions (e.g. API calls, exports, or users) without showing customers a messy rate card. Instead of charging separately for each metric, you can price against a single pool.
Self-serve onboarding needs to be frictionless.
Offering a small set of credits up front lets users try the product without a time limit or forced upgrade. It’s an effective alternative to time-based trials, and maps better to actual value delivered.
Pricing needs to evolve without rewriting the contract.
Because credits abstract away implementation details, companies can adjust internal pricing (e.g. increasing how many credits an expensive feature consumes) without changing the customer’s billing agreement.
You want one system that works across go-to-market motions.
Credit-based models can support both self-serve and enterprise deals. Enterprise buyers can purchase large credit packages with volume discounts, while individual users can start small and scale usage over time—all against the same balance.
In short, credit-based systems give SaaS teams more flexibility in how they monetize, while helping customers stay in control of their budgets. Credit-based models also improve customer experience and help meet customer expectations for flexibility and transparency. That balance is hard to strike with traditional usage-based or flat-rate pricing alone.
Credit-based models give you flexibility, but that flexibility introduces new complexity. To make them work in practice, you’ll need to think carefully about how credits are defined, communicated, and managed. Setting monthly limits and usage caps is crucial to help customers control spending and avoid unexpected charges.
Credits are meant to simplify pricing, not obscure it. If users can’t quickly grasp what a credit is worth, or how many they’ll need to complete a task, they’ll lose trust in the system. Most customers may not understand technical details like tokens, embeddings, or context windows, so it's important to simplify terminology. Tie credits to recognizable actions (e.g. “1 credit = 1 export” or “10 credits = 1,000 events processed”) and keep the math intuitive.
Teams should adopt credits thoughtfully, following best practices for clear customer communication and education.
Tip: Use plain language and real-world examples when describing what credits represent in your product.
Users should never be surprised by their credit balance. Real time meters, dashboards, and low balance alerts build trust and help prevent unexpected lockouts. Additionally, you should also prompt users to top up before they run out. Ideally, do this in product, with clear context on their recent usage and what they’re likely to need next.
Tip: Show credit burn in real time, warn users early, and make reloading credits a one click experience.
Expiration rules, top-ups, rollovers, and refunds often get added late, but they shape how fair and usable your credit system feels. Without clear defaults, support teams end up writing policy on the fly, and customers don’t know what to expect.
Tip: Decide and document these mechanics before launching, even if you start with simple defaults.
Credit-based models work well across go-to-market motions. You can offer free credits to new users in a product-led motion, then scale up to larger committed credit packages in enterprise deals. The same system powers trials, usage-based upgrades, and negotiated contracts, without fragmenting your billing logic. Credit-based models let customers decide how and when to use their credits, giving them greater flexibility and control over their experience.
Tip: To make your pricing easy to understand, keep credit usage consistent across plans, and instead vary how many credits are included or how the cost scales across plans.
Credits aren’t a 1:1 proxy for cost. If you tie them too tightly to backend expenses, you’ll limit your ability to adapt pricing as the product evolves. Instead, use credits as a flexible way to represent product usage, without exposing the raw cost behind every action. Some companies treat credits as a transitional tool, using them as a bridge toward more advanced, value-based pricing models that better align with customer needs and build trust.
Tip: Calibrate credits around perceived value, and leave yourself room to adjust as usage patterns shift.
You won’t get credit pricing perfect at launch. As usage data comes in, you may need to adjust how many credits different actions consume, or how much credits cost per plan. A credit-based system allows you to adjust these inputs over time, without overhauling your entire pricing model or breaking customer trust. It’s important to manage these changes carefully to maintain customer expectations and ensure pricing remains predictable and stable.
Tip: Start with generous defaults, track effective price per feature, and reserve the right to rebalance as usage shifts.
Credit-based models don’t just affect pricing, they shape how your product, billing, and finance systems need to work together. To succeed, you need to align your billing model with credit-based systems, ensuring integration with your infrastructure, product logic, and customer payment methods. And most off the shelf billing tools aren’t built to handle them.
Here’s where things get tricky:
You need a credit ledger.
Credits aren’t just a pricing abstraction, they’re a balance that must be tracked, updated, and synced in real time. That means maintaining a source of truth for how many credits a customer has, what actions burned them, and when the next reset or top-up should occur.
You need real-time metering.
Unlike simple subscription billing, credit systems often require metering usage at the feature or action level. This data needs to be accurate, timely, and tied directly to the credit system, ideally with no lag between usage and burn. Tracking actual usage is essential for accurate billing and revenue recognition, especially when using deferred revenue accounting and monitoring consumption.
You need entitlement enforcement.
When a customer runs out of credits, you need to enforce limits, either by disabling certain actions, downgrading access, or prompting for a top-up. This logic has to exist across your product, not just in your billing layer.
You need internal tooling for support and finance.
Teams need to see credit balances, drill into usage history, apply manual adjustments, and reconcile reporting. If credits expire, you’ll need clear visibility into liability and revenue recognition. This is where most legacy billing systems fall short.
You probably won’t get this from legacy billing platforms.
Most billing systems were designed for subscriptions, not dynamic credit balances. They don’t offer native support for tracking a credit ledger, enforcing usage-based entitlements, or evolving credit pricing over time. As a result, many teams end up building custom infrastructure to fill the gap.
Schematic is built for credit-based billing. With native support for entitlements, usage metering, and credit-based pricing, Schematic makes it easier to manage credit systems across both self-serve and enterprise plans, without custom infrastructure. Learn more here.
Credit-based systems offer flexibility, but they’re not the right solution for every product. In some cases, they can introduce unnecessary complexity or make pricing feel less intuitive. Some companies may prefer pay as you go or outcome based pricing models instead, as these can offer more transparency or better align with customer expectations.
Here are a few scenarios where credit-based models may not be a good fit:
Your product has a single, simple usage metric.
If your pricing is based on one well-understood metric (e.g. messages sent, users active, or seats provisioned) a straightforward usage-based or tiered plan is often easier for customers to understand.
Customers expect full cost transparency.
In some categories, especially those with technical buyers, abstracting usage into credits can feel like a black box. If trust depends on showing raw costs or usage inputs, credits may raise more questions than they solve.
Usage is flat or doesn’t vary meaningfully.
If your customers use roughly the same amount each month, or usage doesn’t scale with value, credits may add complexity without delivering any real benefit. Compared to credits based pricing, pay as you go models may be more suitable for customers who want simple, usage-based billing, while outcome based pricing can be effective for mature businesses looking to align costs with results.
Credit-based models give SaaS teams a powerful tool for packaging and pricing usage, especially when products span multiple features, customer types, and growth stages. They offer the flexibility to adapt as usage patterns change, while still providing customers with the predictability they expect.
Done well, a credit-based system can simplify onboarding, unify pricing across plans, and support both PLG and sales-led motions. And because credits abstract away raw costs, they give you room to evolve your pricing model over time, without disrupting your users or your billing infrastructure.
A credit-based model allows customers to prepay for a set number of credits, which are consumed as they use the product. Each action—like an API call, export, or lookup—burns a specific number of credits from their balance.
Unlike usage-based billing, which charges customers after the fact, credit-based models are prepaid. And unlike flat-rate pricing, credits flex with usage—so customers only pay for what they use, while still staying within a predictable budget.
They’re especially useful for products with variable usage, multiple billable actions, or hybrid customer segments. Think APIs, productivity tools, developer platforms, or anything that serves both self-serve and enterprise customers.
Tie credits to recognizable product actions (e.g. 1 credit = 1 export), show real-time usage, and alert users before they run out. Avoid abstract or arbitrary mappings—clarity builds trust.
Yes. Many companies offer free credits instead of a time-limited trial. This gives users real value and lets them explore at their own pace—without artificially limiting time.
As you collect usage data, you may find that certain features are over- or under-priced. Credit-based models make it easier to rebalance—by changing how many credits actions consume or how many credits are included in each plan—without overhauling your pricing structure.
You'll need a few core capabilities: usage metering, a credit ledger, enforcement for limits or overages, and visibility for both customers and internal teams. Most traditional billing platforms aren't built for the level of flexibility required by SaaS pricing and packaging.
Yes. Schematic is designed to support modern monetization strategies like credit-based pricing, with built-in support for entitlements, usage tracking, and flexible plan modeling—so you don’t have to stitch it together yourself.